falsearistocracy.com

Archive for the ‘Art Reviews + Curiosities’ Category

“[Look but dont touch.] Touch but dont feel” Performance // Installation by Lena Marquise

In Art Reviews + Curiosities, Art Shows, Parties + Theatrics, Uncategorized on April 25, 2012 at 1:42 pm

Image

photo by Andreas Hofweber

Image

iphoto by Thera Marshall

PHOTOS HERE

03.31.12

Installation :: 7pm-3am
Performance :: 8-9pm

Essential [erotica] // group art show

Lena Marquise is a performance artist who focuses on art direction, and works within installations, adding an element of static sculpture – she conveys static tension with her choice of position and blocking, as well as the position the audience is placed within; despite being outside of the conventional context of the installation. In concept as well as in practice, Marquise focuses on the duality of creating works as the voyeur, as well as the exhibitionist.

In “Touch but dont feel.” Marquise invites the audience to be present as voyeurs, and invites them to mentally enter the scene as spectators who fill the empty chair before her.
The rope she is bound by and pulling against shows constant restraint, gag, conveying censorship and constriction of verbally expressing emotions and sexuality. The chair, ever present in the artists work, now takes on an aggressive role, as not only her absent keeper, but also as an introspective on the recent trend to use chairs in sculptural works, as prevalent at the Armory Show 2012. It is the belief of the artist and her contemporaries that emerging trends stifle the artist.

A tangible portion of the installation is the illuminated words cut into a sheet of  black plexiglass “LOOK BUT DONT TOUCH // Touch but dont feel.”, which conveys the artist’s implicit and explicit relationships, those between physicality of emotion, and how the latter applies to the former. The graphics which are attached to the title as a means of solidifying intellectual property, calls to mind the stern warning of a mother to “Look with your eyes, not with your hands!”, in contrast to the following which may have been the wispy words in a faint memory of a whore you loved in Amsterdam, whispering with stale cigarette breath, into your ear.

Sleep No More :: a review

In Art Reviews + Curiosities on May 26, 2011 at 8:06 am

On a block in Chelsea devoid of nearly all advertising, at the west side edge of the world, hangs a lonely sign “Scores”, across from which is a series of large black doors and an ever growing line of sophisticated, middle aged spectators who had all signed up for the earliest time slot on this particular Tuesday evening.

A large, yet soft-spoken bouncer – in traditional security regalia of black sports jacket, black everything – is armed with one blue starred stamp and a short, bouncy sidekick on a walkie talkie – the ear piece strapped to his head.

They let us in 5-10 at a time, “good thing it’s warm out”, I thought as I took one last look down the line before I was ushered in with a handfull of strangers chatting behind me. Only a few steps beyond the door, total darkness set in, with one dim 5watt bulb hanging low in an old dusty fixture above our heads, it seemed as though it might as well have been shining darkness rather than light; I got tingle rolled down my spine. A few minutes later the line had become an exercise for my eyes, to acclimate to the deep black of the walls and the textures of indiscernible paint and concrete, plastic and metal.

Finally, arriving at the “concierge / check-in” of the hotel [venue] I was handed a playing card [10 of spades] and was told to walk to my right and make a left up the stairs.

HERE IS WHEN IT GETS CONFUSING.

By the time you reach the holding area, a smokey red velvet lined jazz lounge [sometimes] playing live music, you forget that you had just walked up X amount of flights, delivering you from the X floor to the X one. Here you listen for when your playing card is called by a crooner of a jazz lounge host, over a vintage microphone, you are ushered to the elevator by the lady of the dance floor. Then, you are handed a mask, ordered not to talk and crammed into an elevator where you will most certainly be separated from your friends. The elevator makes a random stop on either the X, X, X, or X floor, of which you have no say and no knowledge [if the liftman sees you looking at the number display he will shut it off, as I found out]. By the time you are ejected from this elevator, you realize that when everyone is wearing masks and are not allowed to speak [thus becoming anonymous] they become extremely rude, pushy and retain few physical limits when cutting you off. Granted, by now the later time slot / younger ticket holders had filtered in and mixed up the age demographic. We stampeded out of the elevator, I paused, body acclimating to the change in atmosphere.

By the damp chill in the air I could tell I was on the X floor, I walked around some bedroom chambers, a living room full of shelves, clocks and letters from Lady MacBeth. “A clue!” I thought, despite already knowing the premise. I walked in and out of tiny rooms, observing the meticulous decoration as much as I observed the other guests. When I had first imagined the scenes being interactive, my main concern had been people being too polite to ruffle through the drawers and notes. But the rapid news of such a liberally interactive installation must have spread fast, because everyone in eyesight was poking, prodding and sifting through relics like monkeys on a field trip. I circled my way through the layers of draped fabric and electric candles into a ballroom overwhelmed with the scent of pine. In the middle was a dance scene with three couples ballroom dancing in the broad sense of the term. In my corner of the floor, governess put a cloak on a young girl, then the couple hurriedly took off. I follow them; I loose track of the girl but follow the matron back up to the mezzanine of clocks, where she covers them, slowly, with cloths. I wander off to the balcony overlooking the ballroom scene I was standing on only moments ago, now on the dance floor a couple is fighting. A bald witchy woman is hissing at a man, they throw each other across the floor gracefully, landing like cats, or birds, or professional dancers. The man runs off to the side, up the stairs, across the floor – suddenly a crowd of 50 guests is hurdling themselves up the stairs trying to stay on someone’s heels. All heels are lost; I pick a doorway – and find myself on the X floor.

I see a new crowd in a corner in the room, heads bowed to peer down at something. Lady Macbeth is waiting impatiently, body contorting in spastic yet controlled, rhythmically precise movements, building with the crescendo of the song driving her madness. She balances on the edge of a bathtub before loosing her grip – her husband runs in, with blood covered hands, her back too is now stained red. She strips him nude while they embrace in a sequence of frantic kisses, intermittently pausing for his entry into the tub, his last strands of public discomfort shine in his eyes and stain his breath like pigments of hesitation. Rapidly, he rubs off the blood, then hesitantly with a staccato in his step he emerges from the tub to join his Lady; they walk back to the corner and lie down in bed. Then suddenly he sits up, jumps out of bed and leaves the room again; half the spectators follow, some stay – here the Lady rubs her hands repeating “out, out damn spot” as she throws herself violently against the walls and bed, repeatedly. I grow bored and wonder what other performances are going on as I stand glued to my spot, so I exit through the glass doors surrounding the bedroom chambers, and walk through a garden with half walls of brick and large statues of mary bathed in blue light, as I search for performances and a couple particular rooms I remember from the walk through, half of which I never do find. As I continue across the floor turns softer, and the scent of warm moist soil surrounds me. In the distance I see small mounds with white upward crosses stuck into the crests. At the end of the narrow path in the soil is an old abandoned stroller, one I would kill to have. I find my way to another staircase and climb upward.

On the X floor a scent of mulch fills my nostrils [maybe a little too much, as my tissues were coated in black upon exhausting the contents of my nose that night], enormous walls of crates and boxes unwind into a room with a pool table and a wall of 300 playing cards, many of queens, all tacked in one corner. Later, this would be the scene between two men and the bald witch, who will dance and laugh with a card between their lip-lock. The boy witch walks over, standing much too close, he urges me to move silently, seconds before the other man hurdles past and onto the wood bar with a loud thud. Two minutes later the girl on my left has her mask knocked by a stray foot in the tumultuous fray on the pool table. Another girl nearly trips over her own feet, which would have landed her face first on a wood box, trying to outrun the crowd to secure a front seat at the other end of the room to which the action has moved. The crowd is too much for me, and so I escape into rooms that are filled with black magic and dry purple flowers above my head, and others filled with musk like grandma’s. I look for an air freshener, a plug-in of sorts for at least 3minutes before I admit that if I were to find one, it would certainly not be labeled “grandma,” and that all objects, garments and fabrics in the room must contain centuries of history to smell so pungently of the past.

I wander back towards the room full of taxidermy birds, animal heads and bones as if it’s my one familiar sight in this strange massive world. The path there is a hallway of what seem to be a number of rooms and shops through wich actors move, there stands a girl with a box and a key, which a guest tries to touch and nearly gets her hand slapped. Another girl gets chosen and rushed off, pulled by her arm into a little room, to experience a solo show, a creepy lap dance of sorts with incantations and rituals I was not privy to this time around. I walk around the corner, a taxidermist’s workshop, nearby is a candy store; each room decorated and etched inch by inch to the last detail. A funeral parlor with a coffin, books, quill, ink wells and death certificates, stamped with the year 1934. And with that clue, things started to make sense. But, I have said too much already, I will leave not only the remaining X and X floors a mystery, but also the conclusion with it’s occasionally malfunctioning noose.

Folks, this is a must see. I don’t want to ruin ALL the fun and surprises so you will just have to trust me. I know here in Bushwick tickets upwards of $75 sound like less than a steal – but think of it as taking yourself on a date [yes, it's that good]. Save your pennies, and tip cheap, cut corners, don’t cut your hair – do ANYTHING and everything to get your asses to Sleep No More. A-SAP.


Monodramas :: 3 :: opera review

In Art Reviews + Curiosities on April 17, 2011 at 9:57 am

The last time I tried to attend the NYC Opera, it was one of those summer runs where the admission is free.

It was one of those days that’s too hot at first but becomes uncomfortably chill as the sun sets behind the surprisingly tall buildings around 66th and broadway. We anticipated the crowds and thus arrived an hour early only to find not a single seat without a placeholder sweater or bag, beside a row of family members scowling at one another or an elderly couple scowling at you. To my surprise, the free opera my friend had been raving about for weeks was just a large projection of a prerecorded show, cast on a large white screen outside the main entrance of the opera house, for over 300 senior citizens of new york to gawk at in reminiscent of when their social security could accommodate a budget of live entertainment, and if this is indeed what the 21st century entailed.

We took a vote; it was in the favor of taking our picnic to central park, rather than the stairs of the opera house courtyard which too by the hour encroaching the screening was becoming unbearably crowded with early latecomers. The group of us sat in the park, each having a private monologue about the successes and failures of the trip; concealing my discomfort on the cold rocks and disappointment with my misconceptions of what a free opera would entail with occasional laughter, I silently wondered what my first opera in NYC would be.

A little over half a year later, a very gracious friend who I greatly appreciate the company of extended an invitation to the opening night of “Monodramas” [which runs March 25th - April 8th] via the hospitality of John Zorn and friends.

I pick up the program and read the three synopses for the pieces I am about to absorb. I have just enough time to finish them before the lights begin to dim; I close the program, reminding myself to look over the notes and artists later.

The first piece was by our friend John Zorn, which up until reading the program, I had assumed composed all the music for the evening. This first opera was roughly 20min long and called “La Machine de L’etre” ["The Machine of Being"] and focused on the direction of chaos via musical composition and projected drawings by Antonin Artaud in his less gracefully years from the end of his celebrated and schizophrenic life as a beautiful person. The most exciting parts where:

1. the drawings [projected into two word bubbles suspended above the actors, one of which combusted into flames as a finale - which I thought was a copout] by Artaud, because I have a childhood fascination with schizophrenia

2. The man in a red zoot suit who was suspended towards the finale [because if was the only color in the costumes and because it woke me up a little]

3. The fact that Zorn did not write any text for the piece, nor gave stage direction. He left all the visual aspects up to the interpretation of the stage director. What a guy. LET THIS BE A LESSON TO YOU.

The second piece was an old one by Arnold Schoenberg with text/libretto written in an actual language [German] by 26 year old psychology student Marie Pappenheim in the early 1900′s translated on a wide screen at the top of the stage. It was called “Erwartung” [program translation: "Waiting" // wiki translation: "Expectation"] and was the most coherent plot line of the three. It went on for about 30min displaying objective and subjective, loving and suspicious thoughts of a woman who, in a dream, is to meet her lover in the woods but discovers him dead. The drama builds, as the rose petals perpetually fall from the rafters, accumulating on the floor. The conclusion shows how she suspects herself to be the killer, or rather perpetrator of the relationship as she first approaches him still alive in the forest; an abstract flash forward within a lover’s mind.

The third piece “Neither” seemed longest, but was no longer than the second. It was intermediate in age compared to the other two pieces, being composed in 1976-77 by Morton Feldman to a libretto by Samuel Beckett. It was the most abstract but summed up concretely the subject of simultaneous objectivity and subjectivity within one persons internal dialog. The music was a repetitive nine note loop, with mildly coherent pronunciation [mostly the last line "unspeakable home" which resonated for hours after leaving the venue]. The tones changed whereas the notes stayed the same, to the effect of someone singing to you for 30minutes on a rather fast carousel ride. The lulling composition and brilliant soprano put me in a trance for some portions of the piece, but not enough to overlook the tacky reflective stage backgrounds [no doubt in an attempt to elongate the stage] or the musical theater kids they hired to play patty cake with themselves several times towards the height of the internal turmoil. However, the three tiers of suspended silver cubes lifting and falling made up for it all.

If you like tension, this is one’s for you.

“Rubber”, a film by Quentin Dupieux

In Art Reviews + Curiosities on February 21, 2011 at 8:44 am

by Lena Marquise

 

A review,

followed by an interview,

followed by music.

 

 

A few notes about the film on my phone before dozing off at 7 AM after the brilliantly exhausting screening …

— The voice of Robert, the tire, was heard in the non-action rather than action and violence [i.e. the blowing up of heads] towards those who did not impress on him in either a good or bad way. In a way Robert was doing away with what he saw as useless. It seemed like every one who gave in to their emotions during the film was in some way killed.

With hints of the tire smiting down all who are righteous or wrong in this tiny microcosm, including the 3-day killing spree which is much like a plague of exploding heads, this tire is crucified for becoming more human/irrational/emotional than his hunters (going on a killing spree after witnessing a mass burning of tires, and later being humiliated by his crush), and is resurrected as not only a stronger force, but also given the power to grant life to fellow tires and gather a following, much like a religious leader.

Mr. Dupieux’s editing techniques showed his audio-editing background and strengths. Conceptually: he cut up/sampled defining moments of American B-horror cinema, remixed them with an antagonistic tire, set them on repeat, and finally stacked the pattern in order to create a perfect Shakespearean drama.

The film smacks of nihilism, starting with the film’s first sentiment, “for no reason,” but in a much grander sense of metaphysical comedy. Soon, the viewer witnesses a change from nihilism to an inverse of post-modernist theory while maintaining such simplicity that I can imagine dead philosophers cringing in their pine boxes.

Rubber was poorly received at Cannes; however, several critics outside the director’s home country were sufficiently educated to grasp the wink and the nod to classicism as well a progressive modernism. Maybe it was the director’s non-deliberate jabs at High Art that really got them steamed, insisting, [insert French accent here] “No really, there was no reason behind it.” –

30min round table interview

Later that night…

——-

an amazing video on the making of an album ::

i fell in love with this song some time ago — then, performed to it ::

Lena Marquise performing to Pourriture X
@ Hearthrob 06.23.09
Boston, MA
photo by Gillian Bowling
::

read about the writer’s strange dream on the subject here


One Day, Two Reviews

In Art Reviews + Curiosities on February 10, 2011 at 12:23 am

Saturday
January 29th, 2011
Brooklyn, NY
——————————————————————————
St. Cecilia’s Gallery //
Sequence of Waves
21 Monitor St. // 11222
REVIEW ::  A for effort! How many hippies does it take to screw in 1,000 light bulbs?? 60! very excitable local and traveling artists came together in true commune fashion to put together this very hectic show, vaguely about sound [+1MP]. They even found, removed, and re-appropriated the interior of the basement stove my friends and I had stuck a head in towards the later hours of the last opening at this lovely new Gallery // old Church [+1MP]. It now played the part of a table unto which an artist had placed his magic lantern [projector]. The three [well produced] videos [+1MP] on the Sequence of Waves [link above] depict quite accurately the aesthetic, production value and ambition of this fandangled group. Show.
▲▲▲▼▼
——————————————————————————
English Kills Gallery // Steven Thompson // Solo-Show
114 Forrest St. // Ground Floor // 11206
REVIEW :: One step beyond Readymade, one step behind Joseph Cornell. Popular opinions boast boredom with the laziness of the neo-found-object movement. However, I would totally wear that dope off white felt poncho!
▲▼▼▼▼
——————————————————————————
GALLERY
Click on the thumbnail for full size.
Thumbnails with titles below them have descriptions.

——————————————————————————
Watch this video for a quick tour around English Kills followed by a 3min interview at Sequence of Waves with Rouvelle of Maya.Rouvelle [ art duo ]

——————————————————————————
A more detailed review of Steven’s work at English Kills.
For those of you who enjoy soft-core fantasies of how people really respond to mediocre presentations of the arts, here is a verbal illustration of the two walls, in the front room of English Kills, as reviewed [ by Katie Stone ] from a previous installations of the same works, at a different gallery [ Kenny Schachter conTEMPorary ]. The other piece in the front room was a very long felt poncho form of a garment, hanging high from the ceiling, with intricate decorative cuts in the continuous fabric [+.5MP].
The back room consisted of two paintings on one wall, about 5 decks of cards tacked to another wall with some other cardboard and cork patterns stuck together in shapes, desperately clinging to one another in a painfully delicate symphony that I could only take to represent the rooms destitute disposition as a whole.

The back room can only be defined as a three part work bench anchored by a giant rock, belonging to an anally retentive person, who has a strong desire to work on taxidermy, however, is restrained by their own compulsion. The eyeless crow with crossed legs was a strong element [+.5MP]. To quote, “I know I like it because I want to steal it.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.